Re: BUG #8013: Memory leak

From: Jeff Lake <admin(at)michiganwxsystem(dot)com>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #8013: Memory leak
Date: 2013-03-31 03:42:29
Message-ID: 5157B0A5.6020708@michiganwxsystem.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

memory leak with 500 Million rows ??
sounds like to big of a db

-----------------------------------------------------
-Jeff Lake K8JSL
MichiganWxSystem.com
AllisonHouse.com
TheWeatherCenter.net
GRLevelXStuff.com

On 3/30/2013 10:01, stiening(at)comcast(dot)net wrote:
> The following bug has been logged on the website:
>
> Bug reference: 8013
> Logged by: Rae Stiening
> Email address: stiening(at)comcast(dot)net
> PostgreSQL version: 9.2.3
> Operating system: Suse Linux 9.3
> Description:
>
> The query:
> SELECT pts_key,count(*)
> FROM tm_tm_pairs GROUP BY pts_key HAVING count(*) !=1 ORDER BY
> pts_key
>
> Which is executed as:
> GroupAggregate (cost=108680937.80..119278286.60 rows=470993280 width=4)
> Filter: (count(*) <> 1)
> -> Sort (cost=108680937.80..109858421.00 rows=470993280 width=4)
> Sort Key: pts_key
> -> Seq Scan on tm_tm_pairs (cost=0.00..8634876.80 rows=470993280
> width=4)
>
> uses all available memory (32GB). pts_key is an integer and the table
> contains about 500 million rows.
>
> PostgreSQL 9.2.3 on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, compiled by gcc (SUSE Linux)
> 4.7.2 20130108 [gcc-4_7-branch revision 195012], 64-bit
> (
>
> compile options:
>
> env CFLAGS='-O3 -march=native' ./configure --with-segsize=128
>
>
>
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2013-03-31 15:01:21 Re: BUG #8013: Memory leak
Previous Message ajmcello 2013-03-31 03:41:49 Re: Completely broken replica after PANIC: WAL contains references to invalid pages