Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: "Bob Zurek" <bob(dot)zurek(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: "Gavin M(dot) Roy" <gmr(at)myyearbook(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-29 01:13:02
Message-ID: 51494DB187D98F4C88DBEBF1F5F6D4230244F1ED@edb06.mail01.enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Nice job Gavin...

Now that I have landed at EnterpriseDB and joined the community, a
number of high level people have told me they love the Postgres naming
over PostgreSQL because they told me it is a lot easier to say and a
nice name simplification of the OSS project that is experiencing nice
growth and expansion. So I vote for Postgres.

z.

________________________________

From: pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner(at)postgresql(dot)org] On Behalf Of Gavin M. Roy
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2007 9:04 PM
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] The naming question (Postgres vs
PostgreSQL)

I decided to do a little photoshop work in case there was enough of a
consensus at some point in the near future to get the ball rolling.

Gavin

On 8/28/07, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Decibel! wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 03:22:50PM -0400, Ron Peterson wrote:
>> 2007-08-28_10:53:41-0400 Decibel! < decibel(at)decibel(dot)org
<mailto:decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> >:
>>
>>> The google hits argument is no reason not to change the name.
>> It is. When people start searching for information using the term
>> "postgres" they will be missing out on the vast majority of available

>> information for years.
>
> Has anyone actually looked at what those 27M PostgreSQL hits are? I'm
> betting that 90% of them are duplicate copies of mailing list traffic.
> If you exclude content generated by us (which doesn't count because we

> can change the name via sed), I'm betting there's just barely 5M web
> pages about us (which would account for all the Postgres hits).

The only thing that matters is the first 10-12 hits on the first page.

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
<http://www.commandprompt.com/>
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1LSkATb/zqfZUUQRAnkqAJ43dkkf1JHWBpaqFpVwau1U2bu7iwCfWclS
flhG2ylem2uWz9jTLbF5kXU=
=Ze+m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2007-08-29 01:28:46 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Gavin M. Roy 2007-08-29 01:04:10 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)