Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: postgres_fdw vs data formatting GUCs (was Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables)
Date: 2013-03-11 16:40:43
Message-ID: 513E090B.1080703@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> The remote end has entirely misinterpreted the day vs month fields.
> Now, to hit this you need to be using a datestyle which will print
> in an ambiguous format, so the "ISO" and "Postgres" styles are
> not vulnerable; but "German" and "SQL" are.

Is the "timezone" GUC a problem, also, for this? Seems like that could
be much worse ...

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2013-03-11 16:42:18 Re: transforms
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2013-03-11 16:30:15 Re: Materialized View patch broke pg_dump