Re: Enabling Checksums

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Enabling Checksums
Date: 2013-03-07 00:50:37
Message-ID: 5137E45D.9000104@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/07/2013 08:41 AM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-03-07 08:37:40 +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 03/06/2013 07:34 PM, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>> It'd be difficult to change the algorithm in a future release without
>>> breaking on-disk compatibility,
>> On-disk compatibility is broken with major releases anyway, so I don't
>> see this as a huge barrier.
> Uh, pg_upgrade?
Yeah. I was thinking that pg_upgrade copes with a lot of
incompatibilities already, but this is lower-level. Darn.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jim Nasby 2013-03-07 00:51:36 Re: Using indexes for partial index builds
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2013-03-07 00:48:35 Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY