Re: json generation enhancements

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Steve Singer <steve(at)ssinger(dot)info>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: json generation enhancements
Date: 2013-02-24 23:33:53
Message-ID: 512AA361.1030904@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 02/24/2013 09:58 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> Adding a cast to json for a builtin type will have no effect unless
> you also change this code. We can relax that but my view was that we
> should know how to generate JSON from builtin types and just do it.
If json generation from built-in types is complete with full coverage of
all useful types when this first ships, then I'm happy. I was only
concerned about the BC argument "you can't add a proper json-aware cast
from interval to json because we've already been doing it via a cast to
text and changing the result would break existing code".

That's all I'm worried about, and if that won't be an issue then I'm
perfectly happy.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Craig Ringer 2013-02-24 23:48:21 Re: Show type in psql SELECT
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2013-02-24 23:14:00 Re: Show type in psql SELECT