Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]

From: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
Date: 2013-02-11 14:27:23
Message-ID: 5118FFCB.6070105@cybertec.at
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2013-01-26 13:46 keltezéssel, Robert Haas írta:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> More people seem to have voted for the single file approach but I still
>> haven't understood why...
> Me neither. Having an include directory seems good, but I can't think
> why we'd want to clutter it up with a bajillion automatically
> generated files. One .auto file that gets overwritten at need seems
> way nicer.
>

Sarcasm at work. Nice. :-)

--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-02-11 14:29:23 Re: Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-02-11 14:25:17 Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]