Re: Time for an autoconf update

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Time for an autoconf update
Date: 2013-02-08 17:31:28
Message-ID: 51153670.6070308@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 02/08/2013 12:21 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Over in Fedora-land they're trying to institute support for ARM64,
> which among other things means autoconf 2.69 or later:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-February/178273.html
>
> We are behind the curve.
>
>

Is there any good reason not to move to whatever the latest and greatest
is? 2.69 does seem pretty new - even Fedora 17 only comes with 2.68.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2013-02-08 17:36:47 Re: Identity projection
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-02-08 17:21:37 Time for an autoconf update