From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Visual Studio 2012 RC |
Date: | 2013-02-05 16:34:26 |
Message-ID: | 51113492.6090108@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 02/01/2013 08:55 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 02/01/2013 06:12 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
>> On 01/26/2013 10:56 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:20:56PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
>>>> Just to confirm, I think that this is ready for commit as posted in
>>>> 20130101025421(dot)GA17763(at)tornado(dot)leadboat(dot)com(dot)
>>>>
>>>> I'll amend my docs changes and submit them separately.
>>> Thanks. Here's a rebased version.
>> Is there any chance someone could pick this up for 9.3 before it
>> diverges too much? It's ready to go, Windows only, and tested.
>>
>> https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/patch_view?id=1023
>>
>>
>
>
>
> I expect to get to it in due course if nobody else does. I have been
> set back some by the death and replacement of my Windows workstation,
> (plus coming to terms with Windows 8).
>
>
OK, I have looked at this and it seems perfectly sane. In fact, after a
very frustrating time VS2012 is the *only* way I have found to get a 64
bit build using MS tools on Windows 8. Given that, I propose to backport
these changes to 9.2 so we can get some buildfarm coverage of that tool
chain that includes the latest stable release.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2013-02-05 16:37:34 | Re: split rm_name and rm_desc out of rmgr.c |
Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2013-02-05 15:53:13 | Re: Performance Improvement by reducing WAL for Update Operation |