Re: Running update in chunks?

From: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>
To: Tim Uckun <timuckun(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)mail(dot)com>, Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Running update in chunks?
Date: 2013-01-22 18:57:16
Message-ID: 50FEE10C.3080307@pinpointresearch.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 01/21/2013 06:21 PM, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Kevin Grittner wrote:
> ...
> shared_buffers | 32MB | configuration file
> ...
>
> I did absolutely no tuning from the default configuration.
>
But Tim has his shared_buffers set to 1600kB
("shared_buffers";"1600kB";"configuration file") or roughly 1/20 of the
typical default value, which is a very low starting value anyway, on a
machine populated with 8GB RAM.

I'd like to see how it runs with a more reasonable shared_buffers
setting. At a very minimum the 32MB default.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-01-22 18:59:14 Re: Running update in chunks?
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-01-22 18:52:52 Re: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage