Re: Patch for removng unused targets

From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: "'Alexander Korotkov'" <aekorotkov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'pgsql-hackers'" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch for removng unused targets
Date: 2013-01-22 06:32:31
Message-ID: 50FE327F.4030600@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/22/2013 01:24 PM, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>
> I'd like to rework on this optimization and submit a patch at the next
> CF. Is that okay?
>
That sounds very sensible to me, given how busy CF2013-01 is and the
remaining time before 9.3.

--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter van Hardenberg 2013-01-22 06:45:45 Re: Prepared statements fail after schema changes with surprising error
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-01-22 06:31:14 Re: Review of "pg_basebackup and pg_receivexlog to use non-blocking socket communication", was: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #7534: walreceiver takes long time to detect n/w breakdown