| From: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Amit kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com>, "'Tom Lane'" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "'Robert Haas'" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
| Date: | 2013-01-21 02:05:44 |
| Message-ID: | 50FCA278.6090001@2ndQuadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/21/2013 10:03 AM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> On 01/19/2013 04:08 AM, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> However, I am not sure whether Cygwin provides the mkstemp() call or not.
>> Searching... Found bugzilla reports against mkstemp on Cygwin.
> Is Cygwin a platform that should be targeted for the server backend
> these days?
>
> I can understand making sure that libpq works on Cygwin, but is there
> any reason at all to run a Pg server backend on Cygwin rather than as
> native Windows binaries?
I'm not suggesting immediately dropping working support, since this is
so trivially worked around. I'm just wondering why anybody cares about
the platform.
--
Craig Ringer http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-21 02:05:53 | Re: Removing PD_ALL_VISIBLE |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-01-21 02:03:32 | Re: Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |