From: | Gavin Flower <GavinFlower(at)archidevsys(dot)co(dot)nz> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: inconsistent time zone formats in log |
Date: | 2012-12-29 18:59:04 |
Message-ID: | 50DF3D78.4020603@archidevsys.co.nz |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30/12/12 05:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> On 2012-12-29 07:23:24 -0500, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> The xlog code uses two different time zone formats at various times.
>> One is a pg_time_t (stored in pg_control/ControlFileData), the other is
>> a TimestampTz. Those have completely different code paths for being
>> printed (pg_strftime vs EncodeDateTime) ...
>> I don't want to say its impossible or shouldn't be fixed, just that its
>> not trivial to do so.
> Presumably, any fix would involve changing one or the other of those
> so that we use only one timestamp representation in xlog. I'm not
> terribly convinced that it's worth worrying about though. Do we need
> microsecond precision in the database start/stop times?
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>
If I saw an inconsistency like that in a production log, while chasing
an apparent case of corruption, I would tend to think that the
differences in time might be giving me a hint. Knowing my luck, that
will happen to me in a couple of years, after I've forgotten this email
tread!
Cheers,
Gavin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2012-12-29 19:00:45 | Re: proposal: a width specification for s specifier (format function), fix behave when positional and ordered placeholders are used |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2012-12-29 18:56:09 | Re: My first patch! (to \df output) |