| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: enhanced error fields |
| Date: | 2012-12-28 20:34:23 |
| Message-ID: | 50DE024F.6050702@gmx.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/28/12 2:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> No, that's not what I mean. What I mean is that it seems questionable
> to want to do anything *within* an exception handler on the basis of
> where an exception was raised from.
Isn't that the whole point of this patch? The only purpose of this
feature is to make the exception information available in a
"machine-readable" way. That functionality has been requested many
times over the years.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2012-12-28 20:34:39 | Re: enhanced error fields |
| Previous Message | Alastair Turner | 2012-12-28 20:33:03 | Re: Submission Review: User control over psql error stream |