Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Switching timeline over streaming replication
Date: 2012-12-20 12:45:05
Message-ID: 50D30851.2030509@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 17.12.2012 15:05, Thom Brown wrote:
> I just set up 120 chained standbys, and for some reason I'm seeing these
> errors:
>
> LOG: replication terminated by primary server
> DETAIL: End of WAL reached on timeline 1
> LOG: record with zero length at 0/301EC10
> LOG: fetching timeline history file for timeline 2 from primary server
> LOG: restarted WAL streaming at 0/3000000 on timeline 1
> LOG: replication terminated by primary server
> DETAIL: End of WAL reached on timeline 1
> LOG: new target timeline is 2
> LOG: restarted WAL streaming at 0/3000000 on timeline 2
> LOG: replication terminated by primary server
> DETAIL: End of WAL reached on timeline 2
> FATAL: error reading result of streaming command: ERROR: requested WAL
> segment 000000020000000000000003 has already been removed
>
> ERROR: requested WAL segment 000000020000000000000003 has already been
> removed
> LOG: started streaming WAL from primary at 0/3000000 on timeline 2
> ERROR: requested WAL segment 000000020000000000000003 has already been
> removed

I just committed a patch that should make the "requested WAL segment
000000020000000000000003 has already been removed" errors go away. The
trick was for walsenders to not switch to the new timeline until at
least one record has been replayed on it. That closes the window where
the walsender already considers the new timeline to be the latest, but
the WAL file has not been created yet.

- Heikki

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brett Maton 2012-12-20 12:47:21 Re: pg_top
Previous Message P. Christeas 2012-12-20 12:33:12 Re: pg_top