From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Makefiles don't seem to remember to rebuild everything anymore |
Date: | 2012-12-17 14:29:09 |
Message-ID: | 50CF2C35.1020909@dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/17/2012 08:46 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 12/15/12 11:23 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> =?iso-8859-15?q?C=E9dric_Villemain?= <cedric(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Le vendredi 14 décembre 2012 23:02:11, Tom Lane a écrit :
>>>> $ rm gram.o
>>>> rm: remove regular file `gram.o'? y
>>>> $ make
>>>> make: Nothing to be done for `all'.
>>>>
>>>> WTF?
>>> A previous patch changed the ".SECONDARY" from an if() section to the main
>>> section of src/Makefile.global.in,
>>
>
> Although it's a bit odd, it's not really a problem, I think. If you
> want to rebuild analyze.o, you should write "make analyze.o". If you
> want to rebuild postgres, run make in src/backend, and analyze.o (or
> whatever) will be rebuilt.
>
>
>
That's a pretty nasty violation of the POLA. If our leading developer
thinks something about our build process is a problem, it's a problem.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2012-12-17 14:42:28 | Re: Enabling Checksums |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-12-17 14:16:09 | pg_basebackup from cascading standby after timeline switch |