From: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |
Date: | 2012-12-08 17:42:45 |
Message-ID: | 50C37C15.2000203@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2012-12-08 15:30 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta:
> On 2012-10-18 22:40:15 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
>> 2012-10-18 20:08 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
>>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>>> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió:
>>>>> this is the latest one, fixing a bug in the accounting
>>>>> of per-statement lock timeout handling and tweaking
>>>>> some comments.
>>>> Tom, are you able to give this patch some more time on this commitfest?
>>> I'm still hoping to get to it, but I've been spending a lot of time on
>>> bug fixing rather than patch review lately :-(. If you're hoping to
>>> close out the current CF soon, maybe we should just slip it to the next
>>> one.
>> Fine by me. Thanks.
> According to this the current state of the patch should be "Ready for
> Committer" not "Needs Review" is that right? I changed the state for
> now...
Thanks. I just tried the patch on current GIT HEAD and
gives some offset warnings but no rejects. Also, it compiles
without warnings and still works as it should.
Should I post a new patch that applies cleanly?
Best regards,
Zoltán Böszörményi
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH
Gröhrmühlgasse 26
A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria
Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-12-08 18:32:09 | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2012-12-08 16:34:08 | Re: CommitFest 2012-11 Progress |