| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Date: | 2012-10-17 19:27:12 |
| Message-ID: | 507F0690.3080203@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/17/2012 11:32 AM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>
>
>> I am not sure where to stick it but we should also include the fact that
>> rules are almost always slower that a trigger/function comparative.
>
> That wouldn't be accurate, actually.
Let me add: when used with partitioning. I should have been more explicit.
JD
>
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC
@cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2012-10-17 19:43:12 | Re: Deprecating RULES |
| Previous Message | Daniel Farina | 2012-10-17 19:06:46 | Re: Deprecating RULES |