| From: | Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Global Sequences |
| Date: | 2012-10-17 08:20:58 |
| Message-ID: | 507E6A6A.9090902@bluegap.ch |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom,
On 10/16/2012 06:15 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I challenge you to find anything in the SQL standard that suggests that
> sequences have any nonlocal behavior. If anything, what you propose
> violates the standard, it doesn't make us follow it more closely.
If you look at a distributed database as a transparent equivalent of a
single-node system, I'd say the SQL standard applies to the entire
distributed system. From that point of view, I'd rather argue that any
"local-only" behavior violates the standard.
Regards
Markus Wanner
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2012-10-17 08:34:12 | Re: Global Sequences |
| Previous Message | Markus Wanner | 2012-10-17 08:10:06 | Re: Global Sequences |