Re: bug of pg_trgm?

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: bug of pg_trgm?
Date: 2012-09-06 21:02:03
Message-ID: 50490F4B.8090908@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 08/20/2012 01:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> OK. Attached patch fixes the problem as you suggested, i.e., it backs up
>> "endword" if the second loop exits in an escape pair.
> Applied with a bit of further adjustment of the comments. Thanks!
>
>

When moving to a release with this change, will users need to reindex
trgm indexes?

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2012-09-06 21:03:02 Re: Reduce the time to know trigger_file's existence
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-09-06 21:01:02 Re: Minor document updates