Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Date: 2012-09-05 21:50:10
Message-ID: 5047C912.8050709@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 9/5/12 5:03 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> I don't see people wanting to use this feature for unit tests.

If this is going to become an official feature (as opposed to an
internal interface only for use by pg_upgrade), then I think that's
exactly what people will want to use it for. In fact, it might even
make it more likely that people will write unit tests suits to begin with.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Farina 2012-09-05 21:59:29 Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-09-05 21:28:45 Re: Cascading replication on Windows bug