| From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "stuart(dot)bishop" <stuart(dot)bishop(at)canonical(dot)com>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>,<koichi(dot)szk(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Pg Bugs" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #6528: pglesslog still referenced in docs, but no 9.1 support |
| Date: | 2012-09-04 17:49:40 |
| Message-ID: | 5045F8E40200002500049E1D@gw.wicourts.gov |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 12:11:53PM -0500, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>> What do you think would be the right thing to do with it at this
>> point?
>
> Well, there should probably be a tar files with a README. What
> about adding this to /contrib?
I would be happy to add it to contrib if people want it there.
There was some discussion of that when I wrote it, but then there
was a feeling that it would be uninteresting once people had
streaming replication. I'm skeptical that people will ever lose
interest in archiving WAL files, because of the not-uncommon need to
keep archival backups or restore to a "point in time" to recover
from a mangled table. As long as those needs are there, I suspect
that people will want to compress WAL files, including making
partially-filled files smaller.
-Kevin
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-04 18:01:54 | Re: BUG #6528: pglesslog still referenced in docs, but no 9.1 support |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-09-04 17:38:31 | Re: BUG #6528: pglesslog still referenced in docs, but no 9.1 support |