On 03.09.2012 16:25, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Heikki Linnakangas<hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi> wrote:
>> Hmm, I was thinking that when walsender gets the position it can send the
>> WAL up to, in GetStandbyFlushRecPtr(), it could atomically check the current
>> recovery timeline. If it has changed, refuse to send the new WAL and
>> terminate. That would be a fairly small change, it would just close the
>> window between requesting walsenders to terminate and them actually
>> terminating.
>
> Yeah, sounds good. Could you implement the patch? If you don't have time,
> I will....
I'll give it a shot..
- Heikki