Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Humor me: Postgresql vs. MySql (esp. licensing)
Date: 2003-10-14 01:14:45
Message-ID: 5045.1066094085@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vivek Khera <khera(at)kcilink(dot)com> writes:
> I think it is a timing issue. The PG has no way to notify the OS that
> it has finished exiting, so if it takes a long time to exit, the OS
> will ungracefully kill the DB process(es). Doesn't matter what DB (or
> any other application) you're running, you *can* lose data this way.

You most certainly will *not* lose data that way. Committed
transactions will stay committed, no matter how the Postgres processes die.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Edmund Dengler 2003-10-14 01:16:33 SET within a function?
Previous Message Ed Loehr 2003-10-14 01:06:28 Re: backend exit mystery