Re: Audit Logs WAS: temporal support patch

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Audit Logs WAS: temporal support patch
Date: 2012-08-22 18:45:19
Message-ID: 503528BF.2010307@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> I don't think the concerns I raised about apparent order of
> execution for serializable transactions apply to audit logs. If
> we've moved entirely off the topic of the original subject, it is a
> complete non-issue.

That's true, your discusison is about Miroslav's original patch. But a
lot of the other discussion on this thread is not.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2012-08-22 20:48:21 larger shared buffers slows down cluster
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-08-22 17:15:12 Re: Isn't remote_write a really dumb name for that setting?