| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |
| Date: | 2013-01-21 03:11:34 |
| Message-ID: | 5033.1358737894@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> As a junior reviewer, I'd like to know if my main task should be to decide
>> between 1) writing a review convincing you or Tom that your judgement is
>> hasty, or 2) to convince the author that your judgement is correct.
> ... I think you should try
> to persuade the person that you think is wrong, whoever that is.
Absolutely. Form your own opinion and marshal an argument for it.
At the end of the day, most of us are reasonable people and can be
convinced by appropriate evidence.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Craig Ringer | 2013-01-21 03:15:39 | Re: [HACKERS] Overly strict casting rules? (was: proposal: fix corner use case of variadic fuctions usage) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-01-21 03:07:07 | Re: CF3+4 (was Re: Parallel query execution) |