| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Reporting WAL file containing checkpoint's REDO record in pg_controldata's result |
| Date: | 2012-07-14 18:34:31 |
| Message-ID: | 5001BBB7.5070600@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 26.06.2012 18:06, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Fujii Masao<masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Excerpts from Fujii Masao's message of mar mar 27 06:40:34 -0300 2012:
>>>
>>>> Anyway, should I add this patch into the next CF? Or is anyone planning
>>>> to commit the patch for 9.2?
>>>
>>> I think the correct thing to do here is add to next CF, and if some
>>> committer has enough interest in getting it quickly it can be grabbed
>>> from there and committed into 9.2.
>>
>> Yep! I've added it to next CF.
>
> Attached is the revised version of the patch.
Looks good to me, committed.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-07-14 20:02:29 | Getting rid of pre-assignment of index names in CREATE TABLE LIKE |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2012-07-14 18:12:53 | Re: sign mismatch in walreceiver.c |