Re: Good performance?

From: Rafal Kedziorski <rafcio(at)polonium(dot)de>
To: <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Good performance?
Date: 2003-02-17 00:23:45
Message-ID: 5.2.0.9.0.20030217012205.01c43398@mail.polonium.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-jdbc pgsql-performance

At 18:23 16.02.2003 -0500, John Cavacas wrote:
> > ....
> > pstmt.setLong(1, getUniquelongID());
> >....
>
>What is getUniquelongID()? Can you post the code for that? I would
>suspect that might be your problem.

here is the code.

private final static long getUniquelongID() {
return (System.currentTimeMillis() * 1000 + (long) (100000 *
Math.random()));
}

but this routine is very fast. for computing 100.000 values she need 6-7
seconds.

>Your results point to something being wrong somewhere. Just yesterday I
>was doing some benchmarking of my own, and using code similar to yours I
>was inserting 10000 records in about 23 seconds.
>
>john
>
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
>subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
>message can get through to the mailing list cleanly

In response to

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yan Yan Che 2003-02-17 04:21:20 PrimaryKeyExists Error
Previous Message John Cavacas 2003-02-16 23:23:23 Re: Good performance?

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Barry Lind 2003-02-17 04:45:01 Re: Good performance?
Previous Message John Cavacas 2003-02-16 23:23:23 Re: Good performance?