Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first?

From: Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Hackers List" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Search from newer tuples first, vs older tuples first?
Date: 2002-05-02 08:52:03
Message-ID: 5.1.0.14.1.20020502154120.035f25c0@192.228.128.13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

At 12:49 AM 5/2/02 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>Lincoln Yeoh <lyeoh(at)pop(dot)jaring(dot)my> writes:
> > But does Postgresql visit the older tuples first moving to the newer ones,
> > or the newer ones first?
>
>It's going to visit them *all*. Reordering won't improve the
>performance.

Ack! I thought it went through them till the first valid tuple and was just
going the wrong way.

>FWIW I think that with the present implementation of btree, the newer
>tuples actually will be visited first --- when inserting a duplicate
>key, the new entry will be inserted to the left of the equal key(s)
>already present. But it doesn't matter. The only way to speed this
>up is to eliminate some of the visitings, which requires keeping more
>info in the index than we presently do.

OK I'm starting to get it :). Will the index behaviour be changed soon?

Hmm, then what are the row tuple forward links for? Why forward?

Regards,
Link.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jean-Michel POURE 2002-05-02 09:20:58 Re: PostgreSQL mission statement?
Previous Message Lincoln Yeoh 2002-05-02 08:51:15 Re: a vulnerability in PostgreSQL