Re: GCC vs clang

From: "Greg Sabino Mullane" <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: GCC vs clang
Date: 2010-11-16 18:04:13
Message-ID: 4e4f5cc5f660987390b4cdc3fc78c99a@biglumber.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: RIPEMD160

Tom asked:
> What happens to plperl?

It still doesn't work. I was going to leave it out via --without-perl,
and save fixing that for another day. There's a handful of other
warnings when making, but --with-perl is the only showstopper
(once the GNU_SOURCE problem is solved).

Peter chimed in:

> The underlying issue in clang has been resolved, so the next release
> should work out of the box. I suggest we wait for that.
>
> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5365

Sweet, good to know. I'll update my clang repo and see if it does the
trick.

- --
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201011161302
http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iEYEAREDAAYFAkzix3IACgkQvJuQZxSWSsgKxQCgl2vbUGS9plb1Zm7Sg+sdKR+5
oIUAn0CI9Dky2bQsYkoPhV6yZrQWosvQ
=f0+q
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andy Colson 2010-11-16 18:09:47 Re: unlogged tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-16 18:01:04 Re: GiST insert algorithm rewrite