Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.

From: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
To: Beena Emerson <memissemerson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Mithun Cy <mithun(dot)cy(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.
Date: 2017-01-25 19:48:03
Message-ID: 4d49ec8d-6aac-b509-cfa8-8373f207c962@BlueTreble.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 1/25/17 1:46 PM, Jim Nasby wrote:
> Based on that and other feedback I'm going to mark this as returned with
> feedback, though if you're able to get a revised patch in the next few
> days please do.

Actually, based on the message that popped up when I went to do that I
guess it's better not to do that, so I marked it as Waiting on Author.
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
855-TREBLE2 (855-873-2532)

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-01-25 19:52:38 Re: lseek/read/write overhead becomes visible at scale ..
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2017-01-25 19:46:22 Re: Proposal : For Auto-Prewarm.