Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib
Date: 2012-03-19 19:06:28
Message-ID: 4F6783B4.3030607@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 03/19/2012 02:53 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas<robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> maybe we should just rip out pg_backup_files/archFiles altogether.
>> pg_dump is crufty enough without supporting undocumented and obsolete
>> options for multiple decades.
> +1
>
>

Yeah, go for it.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Atri Sharma 2012-03-19 19:20:09 Re: Regarding column reordering project for GSoc 2012
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-03-19 18:53:37 Re: incompatible pointer types with newer zlib