Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)
Date: 2012-03-01 22:09:34
Message-ID: 4F4FF39E.6060209@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 3/1/12 1:57 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> My expectation is that this feature will make life a lot
>> easier for a lot of Postgres users.
>
> Yes. It's hard to overstate the apparent utility of this feature in
> the general category of visibility and profiling.

More importantly, this is what pg_stat_statements *should* have been in
8.4, and wasn't.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2012-03-01 22:12:39 Re: Collect frequency statistics for arrays
Previous Message Daniel Farina 2012-03-01 21:57:36 Re: Re: pg_stat_statements normalisation without invasive changes to the parser (was: Next steps on pg_stat_statements normalisation)