| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joey Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Claes Jakobsson <claes(at)gluefinance(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Date: | 2011-12-18 17:21:24 |
| Message-ID: | 4EEE2114.7000701@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/18/2011 12:17 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
> One small note about the json type being an extension -- this probably
> means the json type oid won't be fixed -- not a huge deal but it could
> affect some corner cases with binary format consumers.
>
>
Why would that matter more for JSON than for any other non-core type?
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-12-18 17:34:21 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2011-12-18 17:17:45 | Re: JSON for PG 9.2 |