Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_dump --exclude-table-data
Date: 2011-12-08 03:19:25
Message-ID: 4EE02CBD.9090700@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/04/2011 10:21 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> A slightly updated patch is attached, the main change being that I removed
>> use of a short option and only support the long name option. "-D" didn't
>> seem sufficiently mnemonic to me. I'll add this to the November commitfest,
>> but I'd like to get it committed ASAP as it will simplify setting up the
>> -pre and -post data patches.
> Instead of:
>
> do NOT dump data for the named table(s)
>
> How about:
>
> dump only schema for the named table(s)

I have no great objection to the wording change.

> I'm also a bit concerned about the relationship between this and the
> existing -s option. It seems odd that you use --schema-only to get
> the behavior database-wide, and --exclude-table-data to get it for
> just one table. Is there some way we can make that a bit more
> consistent?
>

It's consistent, and was designed to be, with the --exclude-table
option. I'm not sure what you want it to look like instead. But TBH I'm
more interested in getting the functionality than in how it's spelled.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2011-12-08 05:07:06 Re: documentation issue - extensions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-12-08 03:15:08 Re: [v9.2] Fix Leaky View Problem