| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: ISN was: Core Extensions relocation |
| Date: | 2011-11-17 05:03:56 |
| Message-ID: | 4EC495BC.2060408@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/16/11 7:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Heck, we don't even have a field bug report that the design limitation
> is causing any real problems for real users ... so IMO, the claims that
> this is dangerously broken are a bit overblown.
This is why I mentioned clients using ISBN in production. I have yet to
see any actual breakage in the field. Granted, both clients are
US-only. I don't believe either of these clients is depending on the
prefix-check, and that's the sort of thing we could announce in the
release notes.
I do get the feeling that Peter got burned by ISN, given his vehemence
in erasing it from the face of the earth. So that's one bug report. ;-)
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-11-17 05:08:32 | Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-11-17 04:50:27 | Re: [PATCH] Support for foreign keys with arrays |