Re: Core Extensions relocation

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Core Extensions relocation
Date: 2011-11-15 18:19:11
Message-ID: 4EC2AD1F.8040301@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/15/2011 12:53 PM, Joshua Berkus wrote:
> Given discussion, is there any point in reporting on the actual patch yet?

I don't expect the discussion will alter the code changes that are the
main chunk of the patch here. The only place the most disputed parts
impact is the documentation.

I like "Management Extensions" as an alternate name for this category
instead, even though it still has the issue that auto_explain isn't
technically an extension. The name does help suggest why they're thrown
into a different directory and package.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.us

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-11-15 18:33:01 Re: [PATCH] Unremovable tuple monitoring
Previous Message Robert Treat 2011-11-15 18:18:54 Re: IDLE in transaction introspection