Re: Guide to PG's capabilities for inlining, predicate hoisting, flattening, etc?

From: Craig Ringer <ringerc(at)ringerc(dot)id(dot)au>
To: Igor Neyman <ineyman(at)perceptron(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Jay Levitt <jay(dot)levitt(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Guide to PG's capabilities for inlining, predicate hoisting, flattening, etc?
Date: 2011-11-03 09:07:21
Message-ID: 4EB259C9.5020102@ringerc.id.au
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

On 11/03/2011 04:22 AM, Igor Neyman wrote:

> Hints.... here we come :)

Pfft! No more than `VOLATILE' vs `STABLE' vs `IMMUTABLE'. It's a
semantic difference, not just a performance hint.

That said, I'm not actually against performance hints if done sensibly.

--
Craig Ringer

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-11-03 09:38:49 Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies
Previous Message Andy 2011-11-03 05:56:00 Re: Intel 710 pgbench write latencies