Re: Dumping roles improvements?

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Dumping roles improvements?
Date: 2011-10-11 17:51:45
Message-ID: 4E948231.9040402@agliodbs.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> What is the logic for not dumping passwords but the CREATE ROLE
> statement? I don't see how anyone would recognize that behavior as
> logical. If you want to add a --no-passwords option to pg_dumpall, that
> seems more logical to me.

That's what I'm suggesting.

Incidentally, what's the difference between -g and -r in terms of actual
output, anyway?

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-11 17:51:46 Re: Range Types - typo + NULL string constructor
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-10-11 17:49:31 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf