| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Mr(dot) Aaron W(dot) Swenson" <titanofold(at)gentoo(dot)org>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
| Date: | 2011-10-03 18:19:34 |
| Message-ID: | 4E89FCB6.4060609@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/03/2011 02:15 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>
>> On 10/03/2011 12:54 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I was never exactly thrilled with the separate-config-directory design
>>> to start with, so I'm probably not the person to opine on whether we
>>> could get away with removing it.
>>>
>>>
>> The horse has well and truly bolted. We'd have a major row if anyone
>> tried to remove it. Let's not rehash old battles. Our only option is to
>> make it work as best we can.
> I disagree. If people were using it we would have had many more bug
> reports about pg_ctl not working.
>
No, that's an indication people aren't using pg_ctl, not that they
aren't using separate config dirs.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-03 18:23:47 | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-10-03 18:19:17 | Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories |