Re: sequence locking

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andres Freund" <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "PG Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sequence locking
Date: 2011-09-21 16:51:19
Message-ID: 4E79CFB7020000250004154A@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:

> - Its impossible to emulate proper locking yourself because
> locking is not allowed for sequences

> Any arguments against allowing it again? It seems to have been
> allowed in prehistoric times.

It would be nice to allow it. I've had to create a dummy table just
to use for locking a sequence (by convention).

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2011-09-21 16:52:18 Remastering using streaming only replication?
Previous Message Dave Page 2011-09-21 16:50:48 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?