Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-16 13:46:35
Message-ID: 4E73533B.1010303@timbira.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15-09-2011 23:54, Fujii Masao wrote:
> #1
> Use empty recovery.ready file to enter arhicve recovery. recovery.conf
> is not read automatically. All recovery parameters are expected to be
> specified in postgresql.conf. If you must specify them in recovery.conf,
> you need to add "include 'recovery.conf'" into postgresql.conf. But note
> that that recovery.conf will not be renamed to recovery.done at the
> end of recovery. This is what the patch I've posted does. This is
> simplest approach, but might confuse people who use the tools which
> depend on recovery.conf.
>
more or less +1. We don't need two config files.; just one: postgresql.conf.
Just turn all recovery.conf parameters to GUCs. As already said, the
recovery.conf settings are not different from archive settings, we just need a
way to trigger the recovery. And that trigger could be pulled by a GUC
(standby_mode) or a file (say recovery -> recovery.done). Also, recovery.done
could be filled with recovery information just for DBA record. standby_mode
does not create any file, it just trigger the recovery (as it will be used
mainly for replication purposes).

--
Euler Taveira de Oliveira - Timbira http://www.timbira.com.br/
PostgreSQL: Consultoria, Desenvolvimento, Suporte 24x7 e Treinamento

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Susanne Ebrecht 2011-09-16 13:47:46 Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2011-09-16 13:30:30 Re: fstat vs. lseek