Re: What Would You Like To Do?

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What Would You Like To Do?
Date: 2011-09-14 14:14:10
Message-ID: 4E70B6B2.10209@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
>>> multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
>>> multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL
>>> has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are
>>> more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL.
>>
>> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have
>> per database users.
>
> Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ?
>
> it says "Enables per-database user names."

Last I checked (it has been a few years) that was at best, a hack. I
remember either I or David Fetter? Writing about some issues with it on
list but it was a long time ago.

JD

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message paulo matadr 2011-09-14 14:15:21 Re: DBI-LINK not support special support?
Previous Message David Fetter 2011-09-14 14:12:55 Re: Sponsored development