From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |
Date: | 2011-09-14 14:14:10 |
Message-ID: | 4E70B6B2.10209@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support
>>> multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with
>>> multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL
>>> has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are
>>> more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL.
>>
>> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have
>> per database users.
>
> Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ?
>
> it says "Enables per-database user names."
Last I checked (it has been a few years) that was at best, a hack. I
remember either I or David Fetter? Writing about some issues with it on
list but it was a long time ago.
JD
--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | paulo matadr | 2011-09-14 14:15:21 | Re: DBI-LINK not support special support? |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2011-09-14 14:12:55 | Re: Sponsored development |