On 12.09.2011 21:36, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> PS2: While we're discussing the cleanup of xlog.c, someone daring could
> replace XLogRecPtr by a plain uint64 and possibly save hundres of lines
> of code and eliminate a lot of the above confusion.
One problem with that is that it would break binary
backwards-compatibility on little-endian systems.
--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com