| From: | Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: rc1 or beta4? |
| Date: | 2011-08-17 15:56:14 |
| Message-ID: | 4E4BE49E.9090502@wulczer.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 17/08/11 17:50, Thom Brown wrote:
> On 17 August 2011 16:47, Jan Urbański <wulczer(at)wulczer(dot)org> wrote:
>
>> On 17/08/11 15:00, Dave Page wrote:
>>> The current plan (or, the last one I recall) is to push another 9.1
>>> release tomorrow, for Monday release. Are we going with beta4 or rc1?
>>
>> Sorry to butt in, but it would probably be good to include fixes for the
>> two segfault plpython bugs[1] before wrapping up the release.
>>
>
> It's not listed as a beta-blocker yet. I take it that it should?
Oh, in the wiki? I don't know, it is a segfault-causing bug, but all I
wanted was to draw some attention in case the people wrapping the
release missed that thread.
Jan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2011-08-17 16:02:41 | Re: pgsql: In pg_upgrade, avoid dumping orphaned temporary tables. This ma |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-08-17 15:52:19 | Re: rc1 or beta4? |