Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Hitoshi Harada <umi(dot)tanuki(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parameterized aggregate subquery (was: Pull up aggregate subquery)
Date: 2011-07-22 13:13:01
Message-ID: 4E29775D.8080603@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-07-02 10:02, Hitoshi Harada wrote:
>
>> Although I still need to think about suitable regression test case,
>> the patch itself can be reviewed again. You may want to try some
>> additional tests as you imagine after finding my test case gets
>> quicker.

Hello Hitoshi-san,

I took a look at your latest patch and it looks good, no comments.
However I also tried it against current 9.2 HEAD and the test query of
the start of this thread.

Before and after applying the patch, I get the same result for the test
query.

postgres=# explain select m_id, sum_len from size_m m inner join(select
m_id,
sum(length(val)) as sum_len from size_l group by m_id)l on m.id =
l.m_id where val = '10101';
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nested Loop (cost=79392.64..82938.05 rows=100 width=12)
Join Filter: (m.id = size_l.m_id)
-> Seq Scan on size_m m (cost=0.00..897.00 rows=1 width=4)
Filter: (val = '10101'::text)
-> GroupAggregate (cost=79392.64..81592.15 rows=19951 width=277)
-> Sort (cost=79392.64..79892.64 rows=200000 width=277)
Sort Key: size_l.m_id
-> Seq Scan on size_l (cost=0.00..9829.00 rows=200000
width=277)

I double checked that I had applied the patch (git diff shows the
patch), installed and restarted postgres. The database is a fresh
created database with no edits in postgresql.conf.

regards,

--
Yeb Havinga
http://www.mgrid.net/
Mastering Medical Data

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-07-22 14:01:41 Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper
Previous Message Albe Laurenz 2011-07-22 12:09:35 Re: Questions and experiences writing a Foreign Data Wrapper