Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2

From: Yeb Havinga <yebhavinga(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kohei Kaigai <Kohei(dot)Kaigai(at)emea(dot)nec(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2
Date: 2011-07-20 14:15:40
Message-ID: 4E26E30C.2070400@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2011-07-20 16:06, Noah Misch wrote:
>
> The SQL-level semantics of the view define the access rules in question. How
> would you translate that into tests to apply at a lower level?
I assumed the leaky view thread was about row level security, not about
access rules to views, since it was mentioned at the RLS wiki page for
se-pgsql. Sorry for the confusion.

regards,
Yeb

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yeb Havinga 2011-07-20 14:23:10 Re: [v9.2] Fix leaky-view problem, part 2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-07-20 14:08:32 Re: Another issue with invalid XML values