Re: Full GUID support

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Full GUID support
Date: 2011-07-12 19:44:28
Message-ID: 4E1CA41C.504@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 07/12/2011 09:15 AM, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
>
> On 07/12/2011 12:03 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>> On 07/03/2011 11:54 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On sön, 2011-07-03 at 13:42 -0500, Michael Gould wrote:
>>>> I would like to request that full support for the UUID data type can
>>>> added.
>>>> I think that even though there is a contrib module, since this is a
>>>> standard
>>>> datatype that Postgres ought to be the one actually assigning the
>>>> value.
>>>
>>> What difference would that make? In 9.1, you can easily load the
>>> required extension, and there'd be no difference from a built-in
>>> variant.
>>>
>>
>> It is about usability folks.
>
>
> What about extensions makes them less usable?

It is an extra step, that is less usable. Does it matter? Shrug, I know
I hate having to type apt-get just to use xyz, does it mean it is a big
deal? Probably not.

--
Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development
The PostgreSQL Conference - http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
@cmdpromptinc - @postgresconf - 509-416-6579

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2011-07-12 20:29:33 Re: Full GUID support
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2011-07-12 19:24:17 Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks, v4