From: | Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
Date: | 2011-07-06 20:41:40 |
Message-ID: | 4E14C884.8040801@gmx.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Review of VS 2010 support patches
From: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>
To: Brar Piening <brar(at)gmx(dot)de>
Date: 06.07.2011 14:56
> It turns out that VS2010v8.patch is also attached to the same message.
> Not that you'd know it from the ... interesting ... way the web ui
> presents attachments. Sorry I missed it.
Yes I've also noticed that the web ui has somewhat screwed up the two
patches attached to my email.
This seems avoidable as one can see in
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2011-07/msg00140.php but I
don't know how.
[...]
> That makes sense. Do you want to integrate those in a v9 revision
> along wiht a docs patch?
I certainly could. But as those files are Andrew's work which isn't
really related to VS2010 build and could as well be commited seperately
I don't want to take credit for it.
I'll remove my versions from the patch (v9 probably) if those files get
commited.
[...]
>
> For the docs, it might be worth being more specific about the visual
> studio versions.
[...]
Thanks for the hints I'll consider then once I'll get started with the docs.
[...]
>
> Now I just need to test with Windows SDK 6.0 (if I can even get it to
> install on win7 x64; the installer keeps crashing) as that's the SDK
> shipped with Visual Studio 2005 SP1 .
>
Actually I've also successfully tested an empty (no config.pl) 32-bit
build using Visual Studio 2005 RTM.
Regards,
Brar
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-07-06 20:58:14 | Re: Review of VS 2010 support patches |
Previous Message | HarmeekSingh Bedi | 2011-07-06 20:29:03 | Expression Pruning in postgress |