Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
Date: 2011-06-20 13:42:51
Message-ID: 4DFF080B020000250003E92F@gw.wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> wrote:

> I'm looking for opinions ranging from fix-now-and-backpatch thru
> to ignore and discuss for 9.2.

If it's a pre-existing bug I would think that one option would be to
put it into the next bug-fix release of each supported major release
in which it is manifest. Of course, if it is *safe* to work it into
9.1, that'd be great.

-Kevin

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2011-06-20 13:44:52 Re: Range Types and extensions
Previous Message Radosław Smogura 2011-06-20 13:27:32 POSIX question