| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD |
| Date: | 2011-06-02 17:15:07 |
| Message-ID: | 4DE7C51B.4030709@dunslane.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 06/02/2011 01:04 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Marko Kreen's message of jue jun 02 12:45:04 -0400 2011:
>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Alvaro Herrera
>> <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue jun 02 11:59:02 -0400 2011:
>>>> On 06/02/2011 11:29 AM, Marko Kreen wrote:
>>>>> As there was no going back now, I even touched msvc.pm.
>>>> Why? Windows doesn't have Unix domain sockets at all.
>>> So much for being thorough :-P
>> Well, there is 2 approaches to portable C code:
>> 1) You #ifdef the main code portable
>> 2) You #ifdef common platform in headers, then main code
>> is written against common platform, without ifdefs.
>>
>> I'm from the camp #2.
> I don't disagree, just saying that you seem to have gone out of your way
> to produce something that doesn't seem to be necessary.
Yeah, I'm from the camp that says "don't compile code that's guaranteed
to be dead."
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-06-02 17:43:16 | Re: BLOB support |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2011-06-02 17:13:58 | Re: Hacking gram.y Error syntax error at or near "MERGEJOIN" |